Vamos elaborar um prompt utilizando o formato básico: Instrução + Parâmetro Contexto.
A Instrução é o comando principal do prompt representada por um verbo. Alguns exemplos:
Esta instrução irá variar conforme o objetivo do prompt.
O Parâmetro representa o formato que nós buscamos para a resposta. Ele irá moldar o texto elaborado pela IA. Algumas ideias podem ser:
GÊNERO
PERSONA
TOM
EXTENSÃO
COMPLEXIDADE
OBJETIVO
Além destes parâmetros, podemos pedir que o ChatGPT nos forneça uma resposta em tópicos ou tabela.
Por fim, temos o contexto. Este contexto irá indicar ao ChatGPT sobre o que nós estamos falando, assim especificando melhor o que queremos. Quanto menos contexto colocarmos no prompt, mais genérica será a resposta.
Exemplo:
Por favor, elabore uma história de terror de 100 palavras sobre a desvalorização da educação no Brasil.
Faça um resumo em até 30 palavras do texto abaixo:
Aluna de 11 anos ajuda a desenvolver fórmula para descobrir raiz quadrada de uma nova maneira
Júlia Pimenta Ferreira fez uma observação que permitiu desenvolver uma maneira diferente de fazer cálculos. Fórmula foi parar em revista especializada de matemática.
Por Jornal Nacional
Em Minas Gerais, uma sugestão feita por uma estudante de 11 anos ao professor dela levou a uma inovação publicada numa revista especializada de matemática.
"O que vai ser a raiz quadrada de 36? Vai ser eu buscar um número que quando fizer ele vezes ele, ele ao quadrado, o resultado vai dar 36. Então a raiz quadrada vai ser quanto? 6!", diz o professor de matemática Frederico Ferreira a seus alunos.
A Júlia Pimenta Ferreira, aos 11 anos, descobriu um jeito de calcular a raiz quadrada sem ficar fazendo um monte de tentativa.
A amiga Lara Barros, 12 anos, mal acreditou. "No começo eu não estava entendendo nada, mas depois que ela me contou, eu achei que ela é muito genial", falou.
"Era algo completamente diferente do tradicional e fantástico. Não era utilizado pelos estudantes, não é ensinado nas escolas, não é ensinado nas faculdades. Foi uma fórmula diferente de resolver o problema", diz o professor Frederico.
"Tô orgulhosa por ter pensado nisso e o Fred ter me escutado", diz Júlia.
A partir da ideia da Júlia, o professor Fred criou uma fórmula enorme e que foi parar numa das revistas científicas de matemática mais importantes do Brasil. E assim, agora, tem um jeito novo de calcular raiz quadrada, o que pra muitos estudantes simplifica bem as contas.
Me explique o texto abaixo em português como se eu fosse uma criança de 10 anos:
Why free will doesn't exist, according to Robert Sapolsky
It's hard to let go of the idea that free will exists, but neuroscientist Robert Sapolsky says that society starts to look very different once you do
Robert Sapolsky is one of the most revered scientists alive today. He made his name from his work studying wild baboons in Kenya, unpicking how their complex social lives lead to stress and how that affects their health.
His most recent focus, however, has been on something rather different – a book that comprehensively argues that free will doesn’t exist in any shape or form.
As he writes: “We are nothing more or less than the sum of that which we could not control – our biology, our environments, their interactions”.
In this episode of CultureLab, Sapolsky outlines his case against free will and what a society without free will should look like.
Transcript
Timothy Revell: Many of our listeners, they will know you as someone who spent years studying wild baboons, and then, also, as an eminent neuroscientist, so what made you decide to then suddenly look at free will so closely, which is, I guess, more often associated with philosophy? Was there, like, an enticing incident? Did something get you onto it first?
Robert Sapolsky: Yes. I turned fourteen years old, at one point, and had a somewhat existentially unnerving experience and, that night, woke up at around two in the morning and say, “Aha, I get it. There’s no God, there’s no purpose, and there’s no free will,” and it’s been, kind of, like that every since.
More approximately, about five years ago, I published a book called, Behave, The Biology of Humans at our Best and Worst, and I did a lot of public lecturing about, sort of, the general subject in the years since. And you’d go through, sort of, an hour’s talk of telling people about, the events one second before behaviour and one minute, and one hour, and one thousand years and all these different influences. With some regularity, somebody in the audience, afterwards, with Q&A, would say something like, “Wow. All this stuff, kind of, makes one wonder about free will,” which I, in effect, would say, “You think?” and it just struck me that I needed to write something that, very expectantly, tackled how completely silly and bankrupt the notion of free will is, when you put all the relevant science together.
Then dealing with the bigger issue, I know it seems very straightforward and simplistic by now to me that there’s no free will, but the massive issue of, “Ph my God, what are we supposed to do if people actually started believing this? How are we supposed to function?’
Timothy Revell: It’s funny that you say it’s now so easy to say that free will doesn’t exist, but I think for many people it’s one of those things that, subjectively, it feels very real, but then, you know, a good argument against that is a tale feels solid, but it’s mostly empty space, so we can’t really trust what we think about the world, certainly not our own experience of it. For those that haven’t spent as much time thinking about free will and reached the conclusion that you have, that it doesn’t exist, what is the argument? What does science say about free will?
Robert Sapolsky: Well, my essential song and dance, and I should add about 90-95 per cent of philosophers agree, that there’s free will, and steadfastly hold onto it, and these are folks, who classify themselves as compatibilists, which is to say they’re willing to admit there are things like atoms and molecules and cells out there, but somehow, despite that, can still pull free will out of the hat in their thinking.
In terms of my orientation, my basic approach is you look at a behaviour and someone has just done something that’s wonderful or awful or ambiguously in-between or in the eyes of the beholder, but some behaviour has happened, and you ask, “Why did that occur?” and you’re asking a whole hierarchy of questions. You’re, of course, asking, “Which neurons did what, ten milliseconds before?” but you’re also asking, “What sensory stimuli in the previous minutes triggered that?” but you’re also asking, “What did this morning’s hormone levels have to do with how sensitive your brain would be to those stimuli?”
You’re also asking, “What have the previous months been, trauma, stimulation, whatever, in terms of neuroplasticity?” and before you know it, you’re back to adolescents and your last gasp of constructing your frontal cortex, and childhood and foetal environment and it’s epigenetic consequences, and of course, genes. Amazingly, at that point, you have to push further back. What sort of culture were your ancestors inventing and what sort of ecosystems prompted those inventions, because that was influencing how your mother was mothering you within minutes of birth, and then, you know, some evolution thrown in for good measure.
Free will
Free will: Can neuroscience reveal if your choices are yours to make?
Philosophers have wrestled with the question of whether we are truly free to decide on our actions for centuries. Now, insights from genetics, neuroscience and evolutionary biology are shedding fresh light on the issue
What you see at that point is, not just saying, “Wow, when you look at all these different disciplines, collectively, they’re showing we’re just biological machines,” but they’re not all these different disciplines. They’re all one continuous one. If you’re talking about genes, by definition, genes and behaviour, by definition, you’re talking about evolution and you’re talking about neurobiology and genetic variance and neuronal function. If you’re talking about, you know, early trauma in life, you’re talking about epigenetics and you’re talking about adult propensity. So, they’re all one continuous seam of influences, and when you look at it that way, there’s not a damn crack anywhere in there to shoehorn in a notion of free will.
Timothy Revell: You talk about this in your book, but I think, for many people, they still feel like maybe there’s room. You know, with each individual step, it feels like those are influences rather than the 100 per cent determining factor. Is there, when people come to you and say, “Oh, but there’s still a little bit of room,” you know, “These are all things that influence me on a given day. of course, if it’s hot, I’m more likely to go outside and enjoy the sun, but it’s still my decision,” how do you go from that, from influences, to, “It’s not just influences, everything we do is dictated in one way or another, by this whole combination of factors’?
Robert Sapolsky: Well, the jerky, sort of, challenge that I lay down at that point is, “Okay, so you’re still holding out for free will somewhere in there, just because it seems so counter-intuitive if that is all we are,” but look at some behaviour, you just pulled the trigger on a gun, like something very consequential, and you could probably even identify the three-and-a-half neurons in the motor cortex that sent that command to your muscles.
Show me, let’s examine those three-and-a-half neurons that just did that. Show me that what they did was completely impervious to what was going on in any other neuron surrounding them, but at the same time, show me that it was impervious to whether you were tired, stressed, sleepy, happy, well-fed, at that moment. Show me that it’s impervious and would’ve done the exact same thing no matter what your hormone levels were this morning, no matter what your childhood was, no matter what your genome is, the epigenetics. Show me that it would’ve done the exact same thing after changing any of those or all of those variables, and as far as I’m concerned, you’ve just proven free will, and they can’t, because there’s absolutely nothing any of your, like, molecules making you up just did to generate a behaviour that’s independent of every second before.
It is impossible to show that we can act freely of everything that came before.
A partir do texto abaixo, identifique as tarefas que devem ser realizadas. Exiba o resultado em formato de tópicos.
Assunto: Tarefas Urgentes para a Festa de Aniversário de Fulano da Silva
Olá André,
Espero que este e-mail te encontre bem. Preciso muito da sua ajuda para organizar a festa de aniversário do Fulano da Silva. A festa está chegando e temos algumas pendências importantes que precisam da sua atenção. Primeiro, preciso que você confirme o aluguel do espaço. O evento acontecerá no próximo sábado e ainda não temos a confirmação do local. Segundo, a lista de convidados precisa ser finalizada até quarta-feira, para que possamos enviar os convites a tempo. A música é essencial, então, por favor, entre em contato com o DJ e confirme se ele tem a playlist que Fulano gosta. A quarta tarefa é verificar a decoração. O tema é 'Festa Tropical', então queremos muitas cores e elementos naturais. Por último, e talvez o mais importante, não esqueça de encomendar o bolo. Fulano ama chocolate, então escolha um bolo bem recheado e que seja suficiente para 30 pessoas.
Agradeço desde já a sua ajuda e aguardo a confirmação de que estas tarefas estarão sob seu controle.